EVE Search - Is MAX having an impact?

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Is MAX having an impact?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Tree Fiddy Caldari Heretic Entity	Posted - 2008.07.22 01:11:00 - [1] In the early days of MAX it was clear that in BS terms the GBC took a bit of a pasting, whether this was embarrasing or just slightly annoying for the GBC I'll leave for another thread. Bearing this in mind can anyone tell me whether the GBC are having any success versus the NC, is it a stalemate or maybe even the NC are repelling the GBC? Have the GBC had much success in removing the infrastructure of the NC thus living upto the tag that they will control the games of those they set their sights on. Does this count for nought if the GBC cant get a cynojammer down. I'm genuinely interested to know just how much devestation "MAXiumum damage" has caused. Now COAD can be painful on the eyes but I've tried to sift through the threads and I cant really see answers to my questions. dons flamesuit I say I ain't giving you no tree fiddy you goddamned Loch Ness monster.
Tree Fiddy Caldari Heretic Entity	Posted - 2008.07.22 19:47:00 - [2] Originally by: Lunas Feelgood Originally by: TWD Also I'm proud to mention that our K/D in the last days have been quite good btws. Well it coulnt really go any place but up could it? but gratz TWD now you just need another 400 bs, 100 hacs, 50 BC and then you back to square 1. Btw may I recommend that you kill NC ships and not some toher muppets becuase that would proberly look abit better but then again with you guys PR department you could fart in jita and and then somehow manage to call it a doomsday attack I'm not sure why but your bitterness amuses me. Whats interesting in this thread is to note the contrasting styles of what is deemed to be a success. Why does it matter that its RA infrastructure falling, surely RA is an enemy of the GBC and thus its in the GBC's interest to make money while their enemy has access to less isk making facilities? NC standing idly by as RA gets hit in the pocket suggests to me a marriage not exactly made in heaven. Food for thought for RA I fancy. Ultimately if the GBC make more money and deny more money for their enemies than the cost of a few ships (and lets face it are all those BS really that important)then one could suggest that MAX is a success. Attempts at undermining that success by suggesting that goal posts have been moved are irrelevant. I say I ain't giving you no tree fiddy you goddamned Loch Ness monster.
Tree Fiddy Caldari Heretic Entity	Posted - 2008.07.22 20:20:00 - [3] Originally by: Herm0dhr Edited by: Herm0dhr on 22/07/2008 19:50:09 Yea, as long as bob and pets have fun shooting POSes and avoiding fights with conventional fleets it¦s all good I think :) Interesting take on things. Couldnt the GBC just say the NC could come after them if they want these fights so badly? Arent the the NC just sat looking at bubbles at the minute and this suits the GBC as they take apart infrastructure unchallenged? One could argue that at least the GBC are having an impact while the NC do nothing apart save for the initial BS kills. I say I ain't giving you no tree fiddy you goddamned Loch Ness monster.
Tree Fiddy Caldari Heretic Entity	Posted - 2008.07.22 21:59:00 - [4] Originally by: NerftheSmurf if moons are such a big deal, why ignore fountain, which is far more valuable How would removing PL from fountain stop revenue going to RA from moons in Deklein? I know it must be hard to think tactically what with you being a member of Failswarm but have a go next time. I say I ain't giving you no tree fiddy you goddamned Loch Ness monster.
Tree Fiddy Caldari Heretic Entity	Posted - 2008.07.22 22:30:00 - [5] Originally by: Cippalippus Primus I don't "hate" bob, per se, I find it funny to control their game. If you control their game does this mean it was you who ordered BoB to destroy RA's presence in the North. What's up did you feel a bit lonely down south? A little vulnerable maybe, like a kitten without its mummy? I say I ain't giving you no tree fiddy you goddamned Loch Ness monster.
Tree Fiddy Caldari Heretic Entity	Posted - 2008.07.22 22:53:00 - [6] Originally by: Cippalippus Primus Nah, I'm fine. I watched Planet Terror again tonight. A friend of mine wanted to see "Shrooms", unironically, and I declined. Now a little bit of trolling on CAOD before going to bed, while I'm sipping some hot milk. What about you? I believe trolling is against the forum rules, having admitted your crime maybe the mods could deal with you accordingly? God knows the world would be a better place with one less Goon spouting his ill-informed, triple chinned mouth off. I say I ain't giving you no tree fiddy you goddamned Loch Ness monster.
Tree Fiddy Caldari Heretic Entity	Posted - 2008.07.22 23:11:00 - [7] Originally by: Cippalippus Primus Originally by: Tree Fiddy I believe trolling is against the forum rules, having admitted your crime maybe the mods could deal with you accordingly? God knows the world would be a better place with one less Goon spouting his ill-informed, triple chinned mouth off. Being ironic about trolling isn't against the forum rules; in fact, I never troll. I have been taught to only say the truth. Nice try but I wpont let you derail the thread, which is about whether MAX is having an effect. I guess the MS kill, the NC doing a hedgehog impression and RA's revenue declining suggests that it is. I say I ain't giving you no tree fiddy you goddamned Loch Ness monster.
Tree Fiddy Caldari Heretic Entity	Posted - 2008.07.22 23:14:00 - [8] Originally by: Cippalippus Primus "Irony is a literary or rhetorical device, in which there is an incongruity or discordance between what a speaker or writer says and what he or she means, or what is generally understood." According to wikipedia. "a technique of indicating, as through character or plot development, an intention or attitude opposite to that which is actually or ostensibly stated." According to dictionary.com See? When I say I'm ironic about trolling, this means that I'm not actually trolling. But you are trying to derail the thread and get it locked which is the usual Failswarm cancerous way isnt it? So STFU unless you want to comment about MAX in the North. I say I ain't giving you no tree fiddy you goddamned Loch Ness monster.
Tree Fiddy Caldari Heretic Entity	Posted - 2008.07.23 01:29:00 - [9] Originally by: Ghaelsto Kakram Originally by: fugazii However if BoB was doing it, you'd call for a nerf. If nerf makes it in game its dining in NOL course 2. With Bob pets as apetizers. 2 courses of fail and all the whine in th world from Failswarm more like. I say I ain't giving you no tree fiddy you goddamned Loch Ness monster.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.